Featured titleCrime

Wild Things 2

CrimeDramaMystery

Sequel to the hot film Wild Things, Wild Things 2 sees teenage bad girls Maya and Britney go on a sex and killing spree to win millions.

Year

2004

Duration

1h 35m

IMDb

4.5

Poster Feed

Cast

Jack Perez

Director

Susan Ward

Brittney Havers

Katie Stuart

Shannon

Cast

Jack Perez

Director

Susan Ward

Brittney Havers

Katie Stuart

Shannon

Leila Arcieri

Maya King

DW

Dorit Wolf

Lecture Hall Girl

Brett Gilbert

Titch

Michael Chieffo

Principal Mosster

Linden Ashby

Detective Morrison

Joe Michael Burke

Julian Haynes

CG

Chad Gordon

Kip Kiepki

Tony Denison

Niles Dunlap

KN

Kathy Neff

Brittney's Mother

Ski Carr

Cicatriz

Isaiah Washington

Terence Bridge

Dylan Kussman

Irvin Brillman

Kimberly Atkinson

Teri Breur

Faith Salie

Lacey

Allan Havey

Vet

Eric Fleeks

Officer Entwistle

RH

Ross Helford

Writer

AH

Andy Hurst

Writer

SP

Stephen Peters

Writer

Trailer

Featured Picks

Looking for more entertainment? Explore our recommended gaming hub and short-drama destination.

Instant Games

Gamixo

Play casual browser games with puzzles, cards, sports, and quick challenges ready in seconds.

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Watch trending mini-series, romance stories, and fresh short dramas with fast daily updates.

Comments

10 Comments

Séléna🍒Nov 25, 2025

ViollyNov 25, 2025

Almaz_MushtakNov 25, 2025

Dounia MansarAug 7, 2024

***************** SPOILERS ************** If you're 14 years old and you've never seen a softcore * movie on your own before, then that might be the only exception to this condition for liking this movie.That movie is a copy of the first one, yet it manages to be boring and mediocre. Same plot twists, same concept, same town, same school. How can they do that in the same school ? ! A ton of plot holes, a ton of events that are not possible - such as Britney not getting caught, who's in charge of laundering the money ? Because it's only a company check, so who's in charge of wiring the money to an account ? Hw can Britney use this money if the company check is signed to Maya ? How can Britney pay off a tenant of a aerodrome without any money on her account ? How can the police not investigate on the missing Julian Hayes ? How can the police not check that Britney checked out exactly at the same aerodrome Niles crashed the plane ? How can Bridge come to the conclusion that the girls murdered Hayes ? How can Britney have nightmares of her mother's suicide when she is actually still alive ? A sequel as uninspired as this, is unacceptable. The cast is a TV second tier actors, the girls are hot but they hardly ever show much of their bodies, the sex scenes are laughable with doubles, a real rip offs. Seriously this is 2004 and you come up with the exact same erotic scene ? Wow, a real rip-offs, a few kisses here and there, a guy in his boxer shorts, what is this ? The only performance worth mentioning is Washington. Other than that, very forgettable movie.

Pat DakeAug 7, 2024

There are a lot of things in common with this movie to the first one:sex, greed and murder in Blue Bay. Considered a sequel, it really isn't, because none of the characters from the first film appear in any shape or form in this home video version (Although one actor from the first film is playing a totally different character in this one). Brittney Havers (Susan Ward)is the step-daughter of Niles Dunlap (Anthony John Denison, famous for his villainous role in the 80's TV show "Crime Story"), an incredibly wealthy guy. Brittney's mother married into money, but killed herself in a car accident. Brittney is of course popular, but Maya King (Leila Arcieri)REALLY can't stand her, calling her "trailer trash" and other ugly things. Their feud starts to take a really ugly turn when Brittney's stepfather dies in a plane crash. Brittney finds out that she will only receive $25,000/year from her father's $70 million estate because only a blood heir of Dunlap's can claim the full amount. Then things get really ugly when Maya claims that she is Dunlap's illegitimate daughter. Meanwhile, Terance Bridge, an insurance investigator (Isiah Washington)begins to smell something fishy with the goings on in Blue Bay...and it's not the swamp. Anyone who has seen the first film of the series (And yes, there is a third one out as well)can figure out the twists and turns a mile away. Lots of plot devices are recycled from the first film (Including some sex scenes). However, the film still makes for a good watch. If you're in the mood for some trash, then give this film a peek.

ZompdeZompAug 7, 2024

The movie is the same exact plot of Wild Things except this time the case is different and the actors are different. The characters are the same. The plot is the same. The ending might be the same but i'm not sure because i feel asleep with about twenty minutes left. So basically everything in this movie is the same as Wild Things except the quality of the movie. Wild Things was a pretty good movie and this remake/sequel is absolute garbage by comparison. Overall, if you have any desire to see this movie, just watch Wild Things. If you have already seen Wild Things, watch it again and then you can say you saw this movie. Nobody will know the difference, I swear. I do not recommend this movie.

Big Ghun TikTokAug 7, 2024

Wild Things 2 isn't a sequel; it's a cheap emulation, an imperfect carbon-copy that takes nearly all of the elements from the first film and simply replays them with a slightly modified script and a different (ie., less memorable) cast. As in the original, the noir-style plot revolves around a group of morally bankrupt characters out to get rich any way they can, meaning that double-crosses, murder, and sex are once again the order of the day, all of which leaves the viewer with a very strong feeling of deja-vu. Bisexual rich girl/poor girl combo: it's there! Gratuitous threesome scene: it's there! Sexy pool scene: it's there! Inquisitive detective: he's there! Further plot explanations during the end credits: you guessed it... it's all bloody there, with zero effort made to add anything new. The no-name cast do their best with the regurgitated material, and the girls are plenty hot enough to make matters easy to endure, but at the end of the day, this is nothing more than an unimaginative cash-in that really didn't need to be made. 5/10 for all the lesbian snogging and * and stuff, but that's being generous.

𝙀𝙡𝙞Aug 7, 2024

Watch the original Wild Things before you even think about watching this. I'm saying this, because a) this is just a re-hash of the original and therefor b) will spoil all the fun you could have with the original movie. Why? Because the acting the script, actually everything is better with the first one. It's obvious that this is just a direct-to-video cash-in. You could wonder what the point is, when the original was great as it was. But of course, if something is successful, they will remake it .. and in this case, just call it "part 2", which is a "cheat" in itself. As are quite a few things in the movie. And while you didn't care about the cheats that much in the first one (because it was good), you will not be able to watch this completely and enjoy it as a movie (depending on your likings, you might enjoy the "bodys" on display here ... though there are better and shorter music videos for that sort of thing)

🇲🇦ولد الشرق🇲🇦Aug 7, 2024

SPOILERS-MANY OF THEM-THROUGHOUT: Actually with Wild Things Two it is quite easy to come up with your own spoilers while your watching the movie. Just think:what's the craziest, most ridiculous, unexplainable thing that could possibly happen. Then wow!!! It happens. That's pretty much the right way to figure this one out. This is a movie that is best watched when one's really out of it and wants a movie that doesn't strain the brain to much. At least with the first one, though it wasn't exactly Oscar material, it contained enough elements to make it interesting. The problem with this one is it's basically the first one taking itself seriously. It also contains(if you can believe this) double the plot twists of the first one. In fact it has so many plot twists it makes the first one look sweet, sedate and predictable. And actually, this is a great movie to watch if you want to really miss the first one. Because Wild things two actually makes Wild Things ONE look better then it is. I don't mean to totally rag on this movie, it had great location shots-a lot of greenery, trees and such. And the cast did well with what they were given. And it actually holds your interest, in that you might want to actually see how far the movie will go in sheer and utter ridiculous plot twists. But be warned: probably further then you think.... I actually guessed the whole movie but as a joke-I really was joking when I said: hey what if this happens. Not that it actually would. Well-it did. I actually wish there was an award to give a movie for this kind of thing, because if there was, Wild Things Two would surely deserve to win.("And the Oscar for most improbable and outlandish goes TO"....). I have never actually been able to predict a movie based on what COULDN'T possibly happen. This was a new experience. So I guess the movie broke new ground in that respect. To sum up-watch it for entertainment purposes, although it certainly isn't good, but, as with a few other not great movies such as Catwoman, there will definitely be some amusement to be had. Just remember: what you absolutely can't believe is really what this movie will give you....that's Wild Things two!

Abou1997Aug 7, 2024

I watched the movie last month. It's an excellent movie with suspense and surprise at every moment. The strarring of my favourite actress Susan wards is so amazing (Besides she's beautiful too). The director of the movie needs an equal appreciation. I hope more sequel of wild things will be made. Another thing is its back ground music. The back ground music that is heard in the beginning of the movie and at the end. So pretty......... The ending is also nice. The end reveals how the robbery is planned.. So very bad for those who leave the chair upon seeing the credits. They miss the 'important part'.